The results of the presidential election is, as Not surprisingly, a theme sounded in recent days. I read a lot about it, did not think so, but here's what I think of the topic. To begin with I was never totally convinced of any candidate, each had something that I looked good, for example:
Keiko Fujimori has taken too much of the past of his father, the government takes it as itself, which causes (nearly) all feel that Alberto Fujimori is the handle all the government, and not her. While the government of his father had things salvageable, but also had things unforgettable. Maybe if his campaign was far from the influence his father, or entire family, had had a little more acceptance, but if it is true, without that past that could also stay in the air without anything. Ollanta Humala
never dissociated directly from Hugo Chávez, a relationship which is known for a long time ago and that has caused many to distrust him, besides his alleged radical change in thinking is not credible. It is the only one who cared to reach the most neglected areas, and well, is representing the voice of protest from people who do not "enjoy" the country's economic improvement. And remember, he may represent a Chavez-like government, or the best, similar to Lula. Lucho Castañeda
has spent as mayor of Lima, I think it was a good mayor despite having positive things, but we need not pure stairs and bridges in the country, we need more. The focus of his campaign was not the best, and compared in an absurd way to Lima Peru, and with all the "faults" that took Susana Villaran, ended his presidential bid going to pan completely. Alejandro Toledo
started well, although it is well supported by his previous government, and he did good things, and it must be acknowledged, of course, like all presidents, had errors. Unfortunately when it started to decline in the survey, their desperation to get votes able to give some embarrassment to some people and that generated a larger repudiation. He finished with a bit of dirty war, moreover, in my opinion, underestimate the fact his wife did not give a good image to the voters. Pedro Pablo Kuczynski
has worked long enough in government, in different light, some say he could have done more at the time, but all in all I think he did a good job. His antics may have helped you get where you came, but you also have to admit, is one of the most prepared candidates we've had. Y why not, remember that the scandal had on page 11 when he was minister.
Now, only two of these five candidates. Should he have given up any lest this be so? Has anyone had a duty to do so? None was required to do so, and none had to ask. But maybe, if anyone did, could be as hero Democrat " the moment. In the event that Toledo had resigned and supported PPK, was more than sure that he secured his victory in 2016 and everything was going well, and obviously would have been like El Salvador to the war. Bad is either dignity, stubbornness or something else no candidate would want to leave his candidacy. Castro could have done the same thing and resign, but would not look that good as it could be Toledo. Toledo called for the resignation of PPK, but that did not seem the best, because Toledo had been in power and his ambition was speaking at the time, that ambition and lust for power.
Now we have two candidates who fail once more to convince me completely. The only thing that pleased me is that we showed to be a fully democratic country, and that the voice of the people who most need the government was listening to that voice lost and forgotten for a long time, which does not live the country's growth. Now you can choose between three options: Keiko, the white vote and Humala / flawed, remember to vote flawed work would have to spend 66% of votes, which is almost impossible considering that between Ollanta and Keiko do 55% of total. In addition, it will void the second round, or the same as nothing. I think the best option is to find which of the two candidates has more to die, and if I may say, look for "lesser evil" . There is something I thought was very true, "Chavez learned of Fujimori" , and pus was a good comparison both governments, and if they start to think about it, they have a lot of similar. Then a foreign political said "A Humala we can provide the doubt, we have evidence Keiko" . Our nobel MVLL Humala has said it can be like Lula, and if so would be good for the country. We also know the relationship between Humala - Chavez. Others think that Keiko rule only five years, which can endure, but we do not know how many rule Ollanta. All I can say is, lean, get informed and decide which candidate to choose.
Last, remember that what is at stake is our country, we are aware of what we do. Also, I know that will not support things that we disagree and we will always have our voice heard, no matter what happens. Ah, the other thing that can happen is that APRA emerges as hero , if the next government is wrong, as it did years ago giving a coup.
PS: No matter what we fight for having a better country, that depends on us, not just the government. And please, do not say to leave the country, to escape from the problems, not solved.
| Tweet | | |
0 comments:
Post a Comment